Viop phone - Voice Over IP

To get corporate America back on the switched network, AT&T devised a marketing strategy. The approach went something like this to the CEO/CFO: “Look, your primary business is banking [building airplanes, trading stocks, selling insurance or whatever], but it is not running a telephone company. Who knows better how to run a telephone system than we do? (You can substitute your favorite carrier here. AT&T is chosen here because they were the first to introduce this service.) You think you are saving money by using these dedicated lines. On the surface, it appears that you are. However, who is managing this network? What is it costing you to recover from outages? Do you have back−up facilities for each of your dedicated routes? Your dedicated team of telephony experts is costing you a bundle. Why are you doing this?”

The CFO and CEO look at each other and shrug their shoulders. “Our CIO or CTO [2] CTO is the Chief Telecommunications Officer or Chief Technology Officer depending on the organization sold us on the idea for providing better service at a lower cost,” they said in unison.
“Look,” said AT&T. “We have the ultimate (outsourcing) deal that will provide all your current capabilities for one low price. We will manage the whole network for you and give you all the service you currently enjoy with your private network with little or no hassle.” Our product is called (somewhat obscurely) Software Defined NetworkTM because you can define the parameters of the
network yourself,” AT&T said proudly. Sprint and MCI/WorldCom [3] MCI and WorldCom were different entities at the time of this offering, but for this book are updated to reflect current situations. TMSoftware Defined Network is a Trademark of AT&T. offer essentially the same product and call it a virtual private network (VPN). We use VPN here because it is both the generally used term, and it is descriptive of the offering. Here is how the deal works: The company defines the locations that will be part of the VPN as shown in Figure 3−2. The larger the average traffic commitment made between these locations, the lower the price per minute can be. (The catch is that if traffic falls below the average commitment, cost falls into the next higher rate category.) carrier will do it. Organizations can now lay off the telecommunications department. (Please note that the staff supporting the PBX in each location is still needed to handle moves, adds, and changes. In addition, the staff needed to maintain the dedicated data network is still needed. Even if the organization migrates to a Frame Relay network, some management of the vendor is always required). All the calls to specifically defined locations (offices) in Chicago, Atlanta, Phoenix, and Seattle are known as on−net calls. These are priced at the reduced rate. Calls to business partners and customers are off−net calls and are charged at a higher rate. If the off−net call volume to these specific locations rises, the organization can still place FX lines into these areas. Again, there is no substitute for knowing the traffic distribution when evaluating any telecommunications plan. As one can determine from the above description, it takes a sharp pencil to figure out if this is a good deal. It is definitely a good deal for the carrier who gets all those calls and minutes back on the switched network. The VPN is more reliable than a dedicated, line−based network because calls are really riding over the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), which is rich in multiple paths. One of the features of the private, line−based network was four− or five−digit dialing. This can be preserved intact if we want. Because the switches in the telephone network are computers that have access to a database, they can easily look up how to route a number based on the originating location and number dialed. The VPN then is a special discount−billing plan, with the carrier managing the network on which we can have a custom−dialing plan.
A caveat that should also be brought into the equation is that the large corporations will negotiate long−term SDN/VPN agreements with the carrier. Typically, the agreements will bear a 3 to 5 year term whereby the customer enjoys the benefits of the fixed pricing arrangement, with some caveats on usage such as minimums, numbers of locations, average revenue generated per month, and so
on. If, however, the average volume falls below an agreed−to level, the carrier may charge a penalty. This penalty may be in the form of

• A minimum charge per site
• A minimum charge per month
• An averaged cost that is used on a quarterly basis (that is, they will bill the higher rate for an entire quarter if the customer does not achieve the minimum billing)

Any one of these charges may apply to the consumer’s billing, depending on the agreement between the players. Incidentally, the customer and the carrier are usually sworn to secrecy regarding the rates and terms of the agreement, through some nondisclosure arrangement. The purpose of this nondisclosure is to keep the mass public coming back and asking for the same deal! Or is it? Sometimes the deal is not as good as it is supposed to be. One such case was a large financial company who had a deal with the carrier for 5 years, yet over that same period of time the costs were rapidly plummeting. The customer was actually spending more per minute for their SDN/VPN than if they just picked up the phone and made a long dis−tance call. Newer contracts will usually bear some terms that state if the costs decrease over the term of the agreement, then the carrier will annually review and adjust the rates accordingly. It may also state
that the adjustments will be enacted if the costs drop by some fixed percentage point (like 10 percent). In either case, the carrier will also hook a contingency that because they are tied to reducing the costs in the contract period should the prices fall, they also reserve the right to raise the rates if their prices increase at greater than some tied percentage point (usually 10 percent). So what we have is an agreement that is somewhat fluid and can be modified during the term of the contract so long as both parties are in agreement. Where this is a benefit is when a company plans extraordinary growth over the term of the agreement, or when there is some speculation that some
sites may be closed and contraction will drop the overall volumes.

read comments (0)

Using these dedicated lines between locations, organizations created a private network. The next step in the evolution of private networks was to devise a corporate−wide numbering plan and have the now intelligent PBX determine the route to the dialed destination via its peers, just like the local telephone office does. After all, other than size, there is little difference between a PBX and a telephone company central office switch!

read comments (0)

As corporate communication volumes increased, organizations realized the cost of telephone service was escalating. Originally, all long distance service was charged on a per minute basis. AT&T introduced a volume discount outbound calling plan called Wide Area Telephone Service (WATS) [1] Some people refer to the term as Wide Area Telecommunications Services. For a monthly fixed payment, the organization got 240 hours of service to one of five bands across the country. Each band was priced, based on the distance from the originator’s location. A typical company usually had a band 5 line and a band 1 or 2 to cover adjacent state calls. It took some analysis to determine the most cost−effective solution for each company’s particular calling pattern. Foreign exchange (FX) service provided a fixed rate calling plan if a company had a large call volume for in−state locations. This is essentially subscribing to telephone service at the foreign central office location and leasing an extension cord from the telephone company to the home location. Originally, there were no usage charges on this line so the more you used it, the less expensive it was. Of course, long distance calls made from the foreign exchange were billed at the long−distance rate. An FX line is needed to each high volume calling location. Alternatively, a company could use a leased telephone line between locations. These lines went by several names: Terminal Interface Equipment (TIE) line, dedicated line, and a data line, when used for data. These are essentially point−to−point telephone lines that are available in two−wire or four−wire configurations. Because the difference in cost between two− and four−wire connections was small (relative to the cost of the line), the four−wire option was preferred unless the company needed many lines. The next logical step was to use these TIE lines to connect private branch exchanges (PBXs) at the various locations. Here again, there were no usage charges on these dedicated lines. A company with locations in Seattle, Phoenix, Atlanta, and headquarters in Chicago might have a “hub and spoke” arrangement of TIE lines from their headquarters to each regional office. Each location then might have FX lines to adjacent cities; for example, a company based in Seattle might have an FX
line to Tacoma, Kent, and Everett. There were corresponding inbound services where the called party paid. For example, the original Zenith operator provided toll−free calling in the days of manual switchboards. The inbound WATS service, now known as 800 service, was originally also structured in bands. Finally, for local toll service, remote call forwarding (RCF) allowed people to sign up for telephone service in a foreign exchange and have them make a long distance call from Tacoma, for example, back to Seattle at your expense. Although this was more expensive (depending on the number of calls) than FX, an advantage of RCF is that you can receive multiple calls at a time. It soon became apparent to people working in the Phoenix location that they could call their uncle in Kent by first asking the company operator (later by dialing) for the TIE line to Chicago. They would then choose the TIE line to Seattle and finally dial across the FX line to Kent. The PBX, although not smart, did allow a person to dial up the TIE and FX lines. The important fly in this otherwise ingenious solution (ointment) to high−cost long distance telephone service is that each TIE or FX line could only handle one call at a time. The challenge for the telecommunications manager was therefore to figure out the optimum number of TIE lines between locations to minimize cost and waiting time for the TIE line, while maximizing savings across the commercial long distance circuits. About this time, AT&T noticed a small drop in its long distance revenue from such business and a sharp increase in the number of leased lines it was providing. Now, clearly it is much more profitable to rent a telephone channel out at $0.25 per minute than to lease that capacity to a corporation for 1,000 per month. One should also be aware that the average corporation will not pay these prices, but smaller companies and independent contractors may! On average, 75 percent of the paying public is overpaying the cost of long distance because of the complexity and the various changes that take place. Recently, the three top providers of long distance service raised their rates by 7 percent (12/2001). The impact was primarily in the area of basic long distance service. This means that many small companies have subscribed to a plan with the carrier. The carrier selects the plan that best fits the customer’s dialing habits and number of circuits used (lines). However, the plan is current at the time of the deal and may change several times in the next year. Better pricing or packaging may become available the very next day. The consuming public may not realize that the new package is available and continue to pay the agreed to rates for the next x years, costing them hundreds to thousands of dollars extra per year. To rectify the problem, many organizations periodically call the carrier and ask for the best plan to meet their dialing habits. Once again, the best plan is selected at the time of the call, not forever adjusted automaticall.

read comments (0)

The Telco uses a variety of connections to service the customer locations. The typical two−wire interface to the network is terminated in a demarcation point. Normally, Telco terminates in a block; this can be the standard modular block. Another version of connector for digital service is an eight−conductor (four−pair) called the RJ−48X. When a Telco brings in a digital circuit, the four−wire circuit is terminated into a RJ−68 or a smart jack.

read comments (0)

Some companies have to decide whether to use a private− or public−switched network for their voice, data, video, and Internet needs. Therefore, these organizations use a mix of services based on both private and public networks. The high−end usage is connected via private facilities creating a virtual private network (VPN), while the lower−volume locations utilize the switched network. Installing private−line facilities comes from the integration of voice, data, video, graphics, and fax transmissions. Now VPNs are used on the Internet to guarantee speed, throughput, quality of service, and reliability. This new wave of VPNs takes up where the voice VPNs left off. Only by combining these services across a common circuitry will many organizations realize a savings.

read comments (0)

Many companies created or built their own private networks in the past. These networks are usually cost−justified or based on the availability of lines, facilities, and special needs. Often these networks employ a mix of technologies, such as private microwaves, satellite communications, fiber optics, and infrared transmission. The convergence of the networks has further been deployed because of the mix of services that the telephone companies did not service well. Many companies with private networks have been subjected to criticisms because the networks were misunderstood. Often the networks were based on voice savings and could not be justified. Now that the telecommunications networks and systems are merging, the demand for higher speed and more availability is driving either a private network or a hybrid.

read comments (0)

The network−numbering plan was designed to enable a quick and discreet connection to any telephone in the country. The North American Numbering Plan, as it is called, works on a series of 10 numbers. As progress occurs, the use of Local Number Portability (LNP) and Intelligent Networks (IN) enables the competitors to break in and offer new services to the consumer. Note that there have been some changes in this numbering plan. When it originally was formulated, the telephone numbers were divided into three sets of sequences. The area codes were set to designate high−volume usage and enabled some number recognition tied to a state boundary. With the convergence in full swing, the numbering plan became a bottleneck. Now with the use of LNP, the numbering plan will completely become obsolete as we know it. No longer will we recognize the number by an area code and correlate it to a specific geographic area. LNP will make the number a fully portable entity. Moreover, 10−digit dialing in the age of convergence becomes the norm because of the multitude of area codes that will reside in a state.

read comments (0)

Prior to 1984, AT&T owned most of the network through its local Bell operating telephone companies. A layered hierarchy of office connections was designed around a five−level architecture. Each of these layers was designed around the concept of call completion. The offices were connected together with wires of various types called trunks. These trunks can be twisted pairs of wire, coaxial cables (like the CATV wire), radio (such as microwave), or fiber optics. As the convergence of voice and data networks continues, we see a revisitation to the older technologies as well as the new ones. Fiber is still the preferred medium from a carrier’s perspective. However, microwave radio is making a comeback in our telecommunications systems, linking door−to−door private−line services. Carrying voice, data, video, and high−speed Internet access is a given for a microwave system. Light−based systems, however, are limited in their use by telephone companies. It has been user demand that has brought infrared light and now Synchronous Optical Network−based (SONET) infrared systems in place. Recently, the introduction of an unguided light introduced by Lucent Technologies operates at speeds up to 2.4 Gbps to 10 Gbps. This offers the connectivity to almost anyone who can afford the system, because the right of way is no longer an issue.

read comments (0)

A network is a series of interconnections that form a cohesive and ubiquitous connectivity arrangement when all tied together. That sounds rather vague, so let’s look at the components of what constitutes the telecommunications network. The telecommunications network referred to here is the one that was built around voice communications but has been undergoing a metamorphosis for the past two decades. The convergence of voice and data is nothing new; we have been trying to run data over a voice network since the 1970s. However, to run data over the voice network, we had to make the data look like voice. This caused significant problems for the data because the voice network was noisy and error−prone. Reliability was a dream and integrity was unattainable, no matter what the price.
Generally speaking, a network is a series of interconnection points. The telephone companies over the years have been developing the connections throughout the world so that a level of cost−effective services can be achieved and their return on investment (ROI) can be met. As a matter of due course, whenever a customer wants a particular form of service, the traditional carriers offer two answers:

• It cannot be done technically.
• The tariff will not allow us to do that!

Regardless what the question happened to be, the telephone carriers were constantly the delay and the limiting factor in meeting the needs and demands for data and voice communications. In order to facilitate our interconnections, the telephone companies installed wires to the customer’s door. The wiring was selected as the most economical way to satisfy the need and the ROI equation. Consequently, the telephone companies installed the least expensive wiring possible.

Because they were primarily satisfying the demand for voice communications, they installed a thin wire (26−gauge) to most customers whose locations were within a mile or two from the central office. At the demarcation point, they installed the least expensive termination device (RJ−11), satisfying the standard two−wire unshielded twisted pair communications infrastructure. The position of the demarcation point depended on the legal issues involved. In the early days of the telephone network, the telephone companies owned everything, so they ran the wires to an interface point and then connected their telephone equipment to the wires at the customer’s end. The point here is that the telephone sets were essentially commodity−priced items requiring little special effect or treatment. When the data communications industry began during the late 1950s, the telephone companies began to charge an inordinate amount of money to accommodate this different service. Functionally, they were in the voice business and not the data business. As a matter of fact, to this day, most telephone companies do not know how to spell the word data! They profess that they understand this technology, but when faced with tough decisions or generic questions, few of their people can even talk about the services. How sad, they will be left behind if they do not change quickly. New regulations in the United States, in effect since the divestiture agreement, changed this demarcation point to the entrance of the customer’s building. From there, the customer hooked up whatever equipment was desired. Few people remember that in early 1980, a 2400 bps modem cost $10,000. The items that customers purchase from myriad other sources include all the pieces
we see during the convergence process. In the rest of the world today, where full divestiture or privatization has not yet taken place, the
telephone companies (or Post, Telephone, and Telegraph [PTTs]) still own the equipment. Other areas of the world have a hybrid system under which customers might or might not own their equipment. The combinations of this arrangement are almost limitless, depending on the degree of privatization and deregulation. However, the one characteristic that is common in most of the world to date is that the local provider owns the wires from the outside world to the entrance of the customer’s building. This local loop is now under constant attack from the wireless providers offering satellite service, local multipoint distribution services (LMDS), and multichannel multipoint distribution services (MMDS). Moreover, the CATV companies have installed coaxial cable or fiber, if new wiring has been installed, and they offer the interconnection to business and residential consumers alike. The Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) who survived the bloodbath and fallout of 2000 and 2001 still remain as formidable foes to the local providers. They are installing fiber to many corporate clients (or buildings) with less expense and long−term write−off issues. The CLECs are literally walking away from the telephone companies’ local loop and using their own infrastructure. Add the x−Type Digital Subscriber Line (xDSL) family of products to this equation and the telephone companies are running out of options. The Community Antenna Television (CATV) companies are still outpacing the installation of Internet cable modems compared to the use of DSL services by the Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC) and the CLECs. The numbers will probably change over time, but the current rate of installation is in the favor of the cable companies. This is where the CATV companies see the convergence occurring.

read comments (0)

In the local loop, the topological layout of the wires has traditionally been a single−wire pair or multiple pairs of wires strung to the customer’s location. Just how many pairs of wires are needed for the connection of a single line set to a telecommunications system and network? The answer (one pair) is obvious. However, other types of services, such as digital circuits and connections, require two pairs. The use of a single or dual pair of wires has been the norm. More recently, the local providers have been installing a four−pair (eight wires) connection to the customer location. The end user is now using separate voice lines, separate fax lines, and separate data communications hookups. Each of these requires a two−wire interface from the LEC. However, if a CATV provider has the technology installed, they can get a single coax (or fiber) to satisfy the voice, fax, data, and high−speed Internet access on a single interface, proving the convergence is rapidly occurring at the local loop. It is far less expensive to install a coax running all services (TV, voice, and data) than multiple pairs of wire, so the topology is a dedicated local connection of one or more pairs from the telephone provider to the customer location or a shared coax from the CATV supplier. This is called a star and/or shared star−bus configuration. The telephone company connection to the customer originates from a centralized point called a central office (CO). The provider at this point might be using a different topology. Either a star configuration to a hierarchy of other locations in the network layout or a ring can be used. The ring is becoming a far more prevalent method of connection for the local Telcos. Although we might also show the ring as a triangle, it is still a functional and logical ring. These star/ring or star/bus combinations constitute the bulk of the networking topologies today. Remember one fundamental fact: the telephone network was designed to carry analog electrical signals across a pair of wires to recreate a voice conversation at both ends. This network has been built to carry voice and does a reasonable job of doing so. Only recently have we been transmitting other forms of communication, such as fax, data, and video. The telephone switch (such as DMS−100 or #a5ESS) makes routing decisions based on some parameter, such as the digits dialed by the customer. These decisions are made very quickly and a cross−connection is made in logic. This means that the switch sets up a logical connection to another set of wires. Throughout this network, more or fewer connections are installed, depending on the anticipated calling patterns of the user population. Sometimes there are many connections among many offices  At other times, it can be simple with single connections. The telephone companies have begun to see a shift in their traffic over the past few years. More data traffic is being generated across the networks than ever before. As a matter of fact, 1996 marked the first year that as much data was carried on the network as voice. Since that time, data has continued its escalated growth pattern upwards of 30 percent, whereas voice has been stable at around a 4−percent growth.

read comments (0)